towing |
|
|
|
|
Dec 7 2004, 06:30 PM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
I have installed the hitch. If anyone wants pics let me know and I will email them. The hitch (although a class I) doesnt show much from the rear. The only part showing is the insert for the tow bar. Hidden hitch did a sweet engineering job on the design.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 28 2004, 08:23 PM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
Here are the stats of my road trip:
One way without a trailer, fully loaded with travel gear -- 30.9 mpg at about 72mph (rpms hoovered at 1900).
Return trip with a 4x8 uhaul closed box trailer with all travel items in trailer and some stuff in malibu trunk. -- 19 mpg. at 72 mph(rpms were above 2100). -- 20.5 mpg at 65 mph(rpms were around 2k).
Weight of trailer = 800 lbs. Estimated Gear weight = 800 lbs. (inc. gear in trunk)
From the initial looks of it, the stats don't look good, but alot of times other vehicles got in the way and the rpms would have to go up around 3k sometimes 4k to get back up to speed. This was only in cruise control mode. Normally I never see 4k or 3k on highway driving. So, pulling a trailer with more than 1500 lbs requires gradual acceleration to avoid wasting gas.
I think its possible to get better milege with a hitch gear carrier (less gear of course) and/or a open and lighter trailer.
In conclusion, my full size truck would have carried the same gear but would have ran about 15mpg at 72mph both ways. I conclude I'm still better off with the malibu.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 28 2004, 08:24 PM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
Here are the stats of my road trip:
One way without a trailer, fully loaded with travel gear -- 30.9 mpg at about 72mph (rpms hoovered at 1900).
Return trip with a 4x8 uhaul closed box trailer with all travel items in trailer and some stuff in malibu trunk. -- 19 mpg. at 72 mph(rpms were above 2100). -- 20.5 mpg at 65 mph(rpms were around 2k).
Weight of trailer = 800 lbs. Estimated Gear weight = 800 lbs. (inc. gear in trunk)
From the initial looks of it, the stats don't look good, but alot of times other vehicles got in the way and the rpms would have to go up around 3k sometimes 4k to get back up to speed. This was only in cruise control mode. Normally I never see 4k or 3k on highway driving. So, pulling a trailer with more than 1500 lbs requires gradual acceleration to avoid wasting gas.
I think its possible to get better milege with a hitch gear carrier (less gear of course) and/or a open and lighter trailer.
In conclusion, my full size truck would have carried the same gear but would have ran about 15mpg at 72mph both ways. I conclude I'm still better off with the malibu.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 28 2004, 08:43 PM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
Wow Pete, somebody posted some good info on here. i thought this board had gone to the dogs :) thanks! if you plan to do a lot of towing, you may want to look into a transmission cooler. heat KILLS transmissions. your gas mileage tells me that the tranny was probably seeing a good deal more heat that it's used to. especially if you're at high speeds and/or in mountaneous terrain. wind resistance is also a factor that increases with speed and depending on the trailer it can make a big difference.
happy trails
j
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 29 2004, 02:15 PM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
Good idea. I'll have to get a tranny cooler and maybe an oil cooler. The factory engine temp. gauge was up slightly, but not by much. If I install them, spending 100-150 will definitely help the car.
I'll probably do 3-4 trips a year with a trailer, but plan to drive the 2002 until it dies (hopefully another 10 years)!
By the way the driving wasn't in mountain areas just small humps/hills/overpasses.
Best of luck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2004, 10:59 PM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
Here is a good website that has alot of posts for all years of malibus:
www.talkaboutautos.com
Most are linked by title or subject.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 4 2004, 05:00 AM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
i pulled a sunfire on a car hauler trailer it did alright i i took it out of overdrive though
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2005, 12:47 PM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
I have a 2-door 91 Blazer, 4x4, auto, 4.3 and it is rated at 5,000 lbs. I've towed with it numerous times (Chevy Monzas, Buick Skyhawks, Grand Ams) using a tow dolly (total weight, well over 3,500 lbs), no problems on short and long trips (one was almost 1,000 miles). Definitely don't use overdrive like the previous suggestion, but otherwise, perfect towing truck and powerplant. Bryan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2005, 08:46 PM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
the trans thats on a 4.3 is the same trans that they put in a V8
Bryan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 26 2005, 11:58 PM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
i would not tow anything with a factory s10 bumper hitch the bumpers are really flimsy, finding a class 2 on one in a junk yard would be the cheapest route if thats your main conserne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 4 2004, 05:00 AM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
i pulled a sunfire on a car hauler trailer it did alright i i took it out of overdrive though
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2005, 12:47 PM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
I have a 2-door 91 Blazer, 4x4, auto, 4.3 and it is rated at 5,000 lbs. I've towed with it numerous times (Chevy Monzas, Buick Skyhawks, Grand Ams) using a tow dolly (total weight, well over 3,500 lbs), no problems on short and long trips (one was almost 1,000 miles). Definitely don't use overdrive like the previous suggestion, but otherwise, perfect towing truck and powerplant. Bryan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2005, 08:46 PM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
the trans thats on a 4.3 is the same trans that they put in a V8
Bryan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 26 2005, 11:58 PM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
i would not tow anything with a factory s10 bumper hitch the bumpers are really flimsy, finding a class 2 on one in a junk yard would be the cheapest route if thats your main conserne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 16 2004, 09:12 AM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
What's the difference between a 4.10 rear and a 3.73?? TIA, Barry Barry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 16 2004, 09:55 AM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
The differential is the final gear between the power train and the wheel. A 4.1 means that the driveshaft must turn 4.1 times to turn the wheel one time. This equates to engine speed, and load. So an engine that turns 3.73 times to turn the rear wheel one time, vs. an engine turning 4.1 times will burn less fuel. However the the engine with the 4.1 reduction will not have to work as hard, and will be higher in the power band and therefore able to produce more power.
Does that help?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 16 2004, 10:08 AM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
So, if I understand this correctly, my 2004 Tahoe with a 4.10 rear will accelerate stronger and tow better? Barry
Matthew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 16 2004, 10:13 AM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
Yes - put simply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 16 2004, 10:19 AM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
Yes, you will have more off the line acceleration, but less top speed. Mark Lueker 308 SYSTEMS www.308systems.com 970-282-7006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 16 2004, 10:44 AM
|
Newbie

Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 26-June 08
Member No.: 3

|
I tow a flatbed trailer which, when empty, weighs about 1000 lbs. On top of the trailer is a 1999 Civic Si racecar. The car weighs 2800 lbs. The trailer has a tire race and I can fit nine rims/tires and they probably weigh about 35 lbs each. In addition, I fill the back of the Tahoe with 300 to 400 lbs more of stuff. From what you're telling me, the Tahoe is more than up to the job. Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Search
3 Pages
1 2 3 >
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Random Featured Members

Random Featured Members

Similar Topics
Similar Topics

Similar Topics
|